Bounding from obsession to obsession.
I veer more toward Gawain, myself. He was the original go-to knight in Arthur's saga before Lancelot got shoehorned into the cycle. I love a good Arthurian chat.
Well, Tristan was pretty cool in Camelot 3000, anyway. And it's kind of neat the way 13th-century writers managed to insert his earlier saga into Arthurian legend. It's nice to have hearty companionship around the Round Table when you've been living in iseultation so long.
You don't really see Lancelot As The Dick until you read Bernard Cornwell's Arthurian trilogy...
I remember being intrigued by the notion of Cornwell writing Arthurian fiction. Is it any good?
Lancelot was played by Michael Vartan , he of the punchable face, in the adaptation of Mists of Avalon (starring Julianna Margulies!). I never could look at Lancelot the same way again.
I'm a big fan of Cornwall's take, that of showing Arthur as the last unifying leader holding back the Saxons. Much of the magic in the book is also more about Merlin and other druids just being smarter and better educated. Maybe. Other things I like in the series would be the pagan/Christian political conflicts, their version of Mordred, Lancelot as moving from romantic idiot to selfish prick, the versions of Merlin, Morgan and Nimue and even the Tristan/Isolode bit (which made me want to punch Arthur in the face)...
I rather like Bedivere myself. But it's true that Lancelot is a tool.
Gawain's my favorite. He always seemed to me to be like the Hal Jordan of the medeival period - he's such an ass, but you can't help but like him. (Also, he tends to have the worst luck in the universe.) That, at least, was the impression I got from reading "Sir Gawain and the Green Knight",but I was always taught that the poem's kind of supposed to be funny. Lancelot, meanwhile, is, indeed, an irritating pretty boy, and I've yet to see or read any versions of "Tristan and Iseult" that didn't leave me wanting to slap them both.
"Other things I like in the series would be the pagan/Christian political conflicts"Were there even any pagan/Christian political conflicts by the year 450? The Roman Empire had officially been Christian for like 80 years at that point, and if there were any conflicts between Christians and pagans, the pagans in question weren't likely to have belonged to the Roman Empire.Incidentally, "The Mists of Avalon" makes little to no sense once you factor in the four hundred years of Roman rule that separated the "purely Celtic" and "Christianized" phases of Britain. I'm just saying, is all.
Let's see: Paragon in every way, except for a horrific character flaw that drives him to madness over and over but which he's never, ever able to actually conquer, until at the end he kind of redeems himself by being a total badass? Oh, yeah, sign me up. That's a character! He's not really a dick, he just..y'know...can't help it, and he's pretty awesome otherwise. He's kinda the Bill Clinton of the Round Table. Well. Bill Clinton pre-2008....Uh. But actually, I don't see how someone could pick Tristan as his favorite and hate Lancelot, when, you know, they have pretty much the same story.
What if your blog could influence the elections in the last run?What if, through your posts, your readers could get involved in the last run for the Presidential elections and bring help to the candidates on their strategic issues…Right People for the President can do that for your blog. It’s new, it’s easy and fun, and it’s free.With a simple copy-and-paste procedure, you will include Right People for the President in your blog, and give your readers a new voice, enabling them to help the candidates on relevant campaign issues. Everyone can contribute, everyone could be “the right person” for the future President.A contribution, a photo, and here your blog becomes a new source of ideas, with suggestions that may very well be useful to the candidates. Choose for your blog a dedicated player, focusing on one specific candidate, or choose our “Random player” with either candidate, changing on each reload of your pages.There is room for amusing contributions – perfect for creating a friendly atmosphere around your posts – and more serious ones. The best ideas coming from your blog will be forwarded to the candidates. A real solution, brought forward by one of your readers, may shape the future of politics. Should a candidate reach out to one of your contributors, you may be associated in their meeting.Right People for the President means more readers, spending longer time on your blog.Right People for the President is fun, spontaneous, and involving. For your blog, it means more visitors, spending more reading time on your pages, returning more frequently to read new stories or to vote for their favorite ones.Right People for the President is viral, with readers inviting their friends to have a look at the player on your blog or to vote for their contribution, bringing you new visitors. Interesting and popular suggestions from your readers will be there to initiate a buzz around your blog. Include Right People for the President on your blog in just 2 minutesIn a few clicks:1. choose a dedicated player, focusing on either B.Obama or J.McCain, or our “random player”,2. choose between our standard size or our column size, perfect for sidebars,3. copy and paste the player’s code in your blogAll details here: http://www.rightpeopleforthepresident.comThe Right People Team
Fitting that an Arthurian thread were get spam.
Brave Sir Robin for me!
I'll take Parzival for $500, please!